Supreme Court: cities cannot limit vacation rentals based on owner occupancy - Idaho Public Television
Summary
The Supreme Court has ruled that cities cannot restrict vacation rentals based on owner occupancy. This means hosts have more freedom in how they rent out their properties. Hosts should review local regulations to ensure compliance with this ruling.
Key Insights
- •The Supreme Court has decided that cities are not allowed to limit short-term rentals based on whether the owner is present. This decision affects how municipalities can regulate STRs.
Action Items
- ✓Hosts should review their local ordinances and permits to ensure they are compliant with the Supreme Court's decision and any subsequent changes in local regulations.Effort: lowImpact: medium
Common Mistakes
- ⚠Hosts who fail to stay up-to-date with local regulations and zoning laws risk fines and potential legal issues.
More from Regulations & Compliance
Carson City, Nevada, is refining its short-term rental regulations. City supervisors are currently reviewing and modifying the local ordinance during a retreat. This review aims to address operational aspects, potentially impacting local hosts through new or revised rules, emphasizing compliance.
A 21-unit vacation rental in Dunedin, Florida, has been approved, signaling potential growth in the local short-term rental market. This approval could lead to increased accommodation options for tourists visiting the area. This news could also influence local regulations.
St. Louis aldermen have approved a short-term rental fee, though a legal battle over existing rules continues. This indicates a focus on regulating the STR market within the city. Hosts in St. Louis should be aware of these new fees, which may impact their profitability. Find out how this affects your STR business.
Curated by Learn STR by GoStudioM