Sacramento could ban owners from running Airbnbs in homes they don’t live in - Sacramento Bee
Summary
Sacramento, California is considering a ban on short-term rentals in homes where the owner does not live. This means hosts who rent out properties they don't reside in could be affected. Hosts should monitor local regulations and stay informed about potential changes to STR rules in their area.
Key Insights
- •Sacramento is considering a ban on non-owner occupied short-term rentals.
Action Items
- ✓Monitor local news and government websites for updates on short-term rental regulations in Sacramento.Effort: lowImpact: medium
Common Mistakes
- ⚠Failing to comply with local regulations, if enacted, could result in fines or the inability to operate as an STR host.
More from Regulations & Compliance
Carson City, Nevada, is refining its short-term rental regulations. City supervisors are currently reviewing and modifying the local ordinance during a retreat. This review aims to address operational aspects, potentially impacting local hosts through new or revised rules, emphasizing compliance.
A 21-unit vacation rental in Dunedin, Florida, has been approved, signaling potential growth in the local short-term rental market. This approval could lead to increased accommodation options for tourists visiting the area. This news could also influence local regulations.
St. Louis aldermen have approved a short-term rental fee, though a legal battle over existing rules continues. This indicates a focus on regulating the STR market within the city. Hosts in St. Louis should be aware of these new fees, which may impact their profitability. Find out how this affects your STR business.
Curated by Learn STR by GoStudioM